agentboards.org
Compare/Google Antigravity vs JoyCode

Google AntigravityvsJoyCode

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
6 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

JoyCode
JD.com · AI-native IDE
#74MCP
Panel
6.0
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
5.7
Longevity
6.2

“A cloud console shows your running remotes, apps and middleware, in case the one thing missing from your editor was an on-call dashboard.”

Spec by spec

SpecGoogle AntigravityJoyCode
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesNoAgents are configured with built-in tools and MCP servers, but the published docs do not name a shell or terminal tool.
Multi-file editsYesYesImplied by the agent and built-in tool model and the spec-driven end-to-end claim; the three published doc pages do not state it in those words.
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI. No
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesA team defines multiple named agents with their own prompts, tools and MCP servers.
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120bbundled Chinese models, custom client-side models
Bring your own modelYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE. Yes
Local modelsYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented. No
Cost
Pricing modelmixedseat
Starts at$20/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars2,446n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticGoogle AntigravityJoyCodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.3Google Antigravity — Pick Antigravity if you want several agents running at once with a browser checking their work; pick Cursor if you want one agent that edits well and stays out of the way.
El Crítico6.35.5Google Antigravity — Agents drive your editor, terminal and a live Chrome with no container between them and your machine; the only isolation on offer is a git worktree.
El Profesor6.36.5JoyCode — Rules resolve in a stated order, team then project then user, which makes precedence a specification rather than an emergent property of whichever file loaded last.
La Inversora7.36.3Google Antigravity — Google is bundling the IDE into Google AI Pro and Ultra subscriptions, distribution no startup on this board can match and a roadmap no buyer controls.
La Jefa5.36.0JoyCode — Enterprise is CNY 79 per user a month, so sixty seats is a line I can forecast, and single sign-on sits in the custom edition above it rather than in the one I would buy.
El Hacker4.05.5JoyCode — Closed source, but the server configuration is a real mcpServers JSON block with documented npx and uvx invocations per operating system, and custom models attach on the client.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.