agentboards.org
Compare/Augment Code vs Multi

Augment CodevsMulti

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.3
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.5

“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”

Multi
Patika Labs · IDE extension
#30
Panel
6.3
5 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
7.2
Cost
7.5
Longevity
5.0

“It installs into VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, Windsurf, Kiro and Antigravity, which is one agent covering six answers to the same question.”

Spec by spec

SpecAugment CodeMulti
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. No
Sandboxed executionYesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesMulti runs tasks in the background so several workstreams proceed at once and describes itself as a team of agents, but it documents no supervisor that coordinates them.
Headless / CI modeYes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. No
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, KimiClaude Code, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, OpenRouter, Ollama
Bring your own modelNoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. Yes
Local modelsNoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. YesOllama is one of the supported providers, so local models are reachable through a profile.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars283n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAugment CodeMultiPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.3Multi — Pick Multi if you want a capable agent in the editor you already opened and refuse to sign up for anything; pick Zoo Code if you would rather the source were readable.
El Crítico6.06.3Multi — Auto-approval is granted per category, so approving shell execution once approves every command in the class rather than the command in front of you.
El Profesor6.56.5no preference
La Inversora7.06.0Augment Code — Publishing a 40 percent service fee is either transparency or a confession, and exposing the index over MCP is a hedge toward becoming a component in other people's agents.
La Jefa6.85.0Augment Code — SOC 2 Type II, CMEK, audit trails and training exclusion on every plan, pooled usage to 50 seats, SSO and SCIM at Enterprise; approved with a spend ceiling.
El Hacker4.36.8Multi — Closed source, and it takes 27 providers and over a hundred models, including Copilot, Claude Code and Gemini CLI subscriptions that need no separate key, plus Ollama.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.