agentboards.org
Compare/AutoGPT vs OpenHuman

AutoGPTvsOpenHuman

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

AutoGPT
Significant Gravitas · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
5.2
Longevity
5.8

“Forty-five integrations, from the project that once promised to replace the person who would have set them up.”

OpenHuman
Tiny Humans · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.5
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.7
Usefulness
5.5
Cost
7.3
Longevity
4.5

“Seventeen messaging channels, which is sixteen additional ways to be told the task failed.”

Spec by spec

SpecAutoGPTOpenHuman
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocal, cloudlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoYes
Multi-file editsNoNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionYesNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Claude, Llama, hundreds of models via integrationsany
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$42.5/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicensePolyform Shield 1.0 (platform) / MIT (classic and other components)GPL-3.0
GitHub stars187,65240,434

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAutoGPTOpenHumanPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.85.5AutoGPT — Pick AutoGPT if the job is a scheduled workflow across Gmail, Slack and Jira built in a block editor; pick goose or Claude Code if the job is code, because this one never touches a file.
El Crítico5.34.8AutoGPT — 187,000 stars were earned by a 2023 agent that now lives in a classic folder, while the product on the landing page is a workflow builder with no shell and MCP reduced to a block.
El Profesor5.56.0OpenHuman — Memory is compressed into Markdown trees held in SQLite, and sub-agent fleets execute on checkpointed graphs, so both retention and resumption are explicit mechanisms rather than prompt tricks.
La Inversora5.85.3AutoGPT — Significant Gravitas pivoted from the agent that started the category to a workflow platform priced at $42.50 and $272 a month, billed annually, with credits on top.
La Jefa4.83.8AutoGPT — Sixty seats need the Team tier with admin roles and centralized billing, and that tier is marked coming soon, so today it is sixty individual subscriptions and a credit wallet.
El Hacker6.07.8OpenHuman — GPL-3.0 means a fork stays open, it takes a local Ollama endpoint, it speaks MCP as a client, and there is no published install command, so I clone it anyway.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.