agentboards.org
Compare/AutoGPT vs Tutti

AutoGPTvsTutti

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

AutoGPT
Significant Gravitas · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.5
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
5.2
Longevity
5.8

“Forty-five integrations, from the project that once promised to replace the person who would have set them up.”

Tutti
tutti-os · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.6
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.8
Usefulness
5.7
Cost
7.3
Longevity
4.7

“It has an app centre where the agents can generate their own slide decks about the work they have not finished.”

Spec by spec

SpecAutoGPTTutti
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoNoTutti coordinates agents rather than executing itself; shell access comes from the agent CLIs it hosts.
Multi-file editsNoNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionYesNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Claude, Llama, hundreds of models via integrationsvia managed agents (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes), Tutti Agent
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedfree
Starts at$42.5/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicensePolyform Shield 1.0 (platform) / MIT (classic and other components)Apache-2.0
GitHub stars187,6523,793

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAutoGPTTuttiPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.86.0Tutti — Pick it if handing context between agents is your daily chore; pick Agent Teams AI if you would rather see that coordination on a board with tasks and diffs.
El Crítico5.35.0AutoGPT — 187,000 stars were earned by a 2023 agent that now lives in a classic folder, while the product on the landing page is a workflow builder with no shell and MCP reduced to a block.
El Profesor5.55.8Tutti — MCP appears in both directions and only in the in-repository architecture notes, not the README, so the protocol story is real and effectively undocumented for readers.
La Inversora5.85.3AutoGPT — Significant Gravitas pivoted from the agent that started the category to a workflow platform priced at $42.50 and $272 a month, billed annually, with credits on top.
La Jefa4.85.0Tutti — Free at sixty seats and macOS and Windows only, with no headless mode, so my Linux engineers are excluded and nothing here reaches a pipeline.
El Hacker6.06.8Tutti — Apache-2.0 with MCP in both directions, and the agents authenticate with subscriptions I already pay for, so nothing new holds a credential.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.