agentboards.org
Compare/Avibe vs Foreman

AvibevsForeman

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Avibe
Avibe · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.7
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.5
Longevity
5.5

“On Windows the recommendation is to run it under Linux, which is the most honest Windows support on this board.”

Foreman
VisionForge · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.7
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.7

“All of its state is committed into your repository, so your git history now includes the agent's opinions about the plan.”

Spec by spec

SpecAvibeForeman
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesFiles are changed by the Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode session Avibe drives; the Workbench adds an editor and file browser on top. YesCode is written by the Claude Code agents Foreman supervises through the pipeline.
Git operationsNoYesAll pipeline state is written as human-readable files committed inside the target repository.
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesA parent session can delegate to background Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode sessions, shown as a run graph. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneClaude Code, OpenAI Codex, OpenCodeClaude Code
Bring your own modelYesNo
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars599442

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAvibeForemanPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.0Avibe — Pick it if you want your agents living at home on your own machine; pick a cloud harness if you want them somewhere your team can reach.
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor7.07.3Foreman — The pipeline runs plan to ADR and PRD to issues to a test-driven build to end-to-end tests, which puts a written artefact between every pair of stages.
La Inversora6.56.3Avibe — 498 stars, a free client, and a hosted tunnel on the vendor's own domain: the classic shape, give away the client and own the relay.
La Jefa5.57.3Foreman — It enforces budgets on the agents it spawns, which makes it the first tool on this board that stops spending rather than merely reporting it.
El Hacker7.56.3Avibe — MIT, an install script I read before running, keys and execution staying on my disk; and no MCP in either direction, so my servers stay outside.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.