claude-code-routervsCoder
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.01 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.3
- Usefulness
- 7.7
- Cost
- 8.3
- Longevity
- 5.8
“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”
Coder
Coder Technologies · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.65 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.8
- Usefulness
- 7.3
- Cost
- 7.2
- Longevity
- 8.2
“It sells you the room your agent works in, which is the oldest business in software wearing new vocabulary.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | claude-code-router | Coder |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local | cloud, sandbox |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows, web | macos, linux, windows, web |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | NoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | No | Yes |
| Git operations | No | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | YesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. | Yes |
| Multi-agent orchestration | YesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | No | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, Bailian | any |
| Bring your own model | Yes | YesCoder runs whichever agent and model the team chooses; the AI Governance gateway brokers the LLM calls rather than supplying a model. |
| Local models | YesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. | YesThe whole platform is self-hosted, so an on-premises or in-VPC model endpoint can be used through the AI Governance gateway. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | mixed |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| GitHub stars | 37,511 | 16,807 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | claude-code-router | Coder | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 7.3 | 7.5 | Coder — Pick it when agents must not run on laptops; pick Ona if you want the same isolation without operating the platform that provides it. |
| El Crítico | 6.3 | 6.8 | Coder — Adopting this means running a workspace platform, a gateway and the agents inside them, which is infrastructure staffing before it is a coding tool. |
| El Profesor | 7.0 | 7.5 | Coder — Observation happens at the protocol boundary rather than inside the agent, which is why it works for agents the platform did not write. |
| La Inversora | 6.5 | 8.0 | Coder — A copyleft core with a per-user Premium tier and a custom enterprise tier, and the licence is the moat because it blocks anyone hosting this against them. |
| La Jefa | 6.5 | 7.3 | Coder — The premium tier is priced per user annually with no published figure, which is contact sales wearing a plan name, and everything else here answers my questionnaire. |
| El Hacker | 8.8 | 8.8 | no preference |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.