agentboards.org
Compare/claude-code-router vs Container Use

claude-code-routervsContainer Use

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”

Container Use
Dagger · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.2
Cost
8.0
Longevity
6.3

“Eighteen agent integrations are documented, which is eighteen programs that were otherwise going to run commands on your laptop.”

Spec by spec

Specclaude-code-routerContainer Use
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocalsandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. Yes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionYesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. YesEach environment is a container built through Dagger, requiring Docker and git on the host.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, Bailianany (agent and model agnostic)
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. No
Cost
Pricing modelbyokfree
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars37,5114,054

Which one would each critic pick

Criticclaude-code-routerContainer UsePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor7.07.8Container Use — Every action an agent takes is recorded into git, so verification is a diff and a log rather than a transcript, and accept is deliberately two different verbs.
La Inversora6.56.5no preference
La Jefa6.56.3claude-code-router — Free for sixty, and the credential pool with key rotation is the first thing on this board that looks like something a platform team would actually want.
El Hacker8.88.3claude-code-router — MIT, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint becomes a provider by writing its base URL into the config, which includes the server on my own machine.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.