agentboards.org
Compare/claude-code-router vs OpenClaw

claude-code-routervsOpenClaw

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”

OpenClaw
OpenClaw Foundation · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.3
Longevity
7.2

“Warelay, Clawdbot, Moltbot, OpenClaw: three renames in ten weeks, one of them courtesy of Anthropic's trademark lawyers.”

Spec by spec

Specclaude-code-routerOpenClaw
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. Yes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionYesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, BailianOpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter, GitHub Copilot, Ollama, LM Studio, vLLM, llama.cpp
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars37,511391,182

Which one would each critic pick

Criticclaude-code-routerOpenClawPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.36.5OpenClaw — Sandboxing is off by default, the docs call it not a perfect security boundary even when on, and bind mounts walk straight through it.
El Profesor7.07.0no preference
La Inversora6.56.3claude-code-router — The entire product is an arbitrage on the gap between what agents charge and what tokens cost, which makes its lifespan a function of somebody else's pricing page.
La Jefa6.55.3claude-code-router — Free for sixty, and the credential pool with key rotation is the first thing on this board that looks like something a platform team would actually want.
El Hacker8.88.8no preference

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.