agentboards.org
Compare/Cody vs Fitten Code

CodyvsFitten Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Cody
Sourcegraph · IDE extension
#175MCP
Panel
4.8
5 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
4.5
Cost
4.0
Longevity
5.0

“Free and Pro ended in July 2025, so the cheapest way to try Cody is now a $16K annual contract.”

Fitten Code
Fitten Tech · IDE extension
#223
Panel
4.9
2 spec wins
Reliability
3.7
Usefulness
4.5
Cost
7.0
Longevity
4.3

“Its agent is called Agent Chat, its warnings are called Signal, and its price is called free.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodyFitten Code
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudcloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesNo
Multi-file editsNoYesFitten describes project context understanding and multi-step task execution; the vendor does not document explicit multi-file diffs.
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeekFitten Code
Bring your own modelYesNo
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelseatfree
Starts atn/a$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesNo
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars3,804n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodyFitten CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo4.86.0Fitten Code — Pick it if you want capable completion at no cost and your code is not sensitive; pick CodeGeeX when you want a similar deal with a published model behind it.
El Crítico4.34.8Fitten Code — Execution is hosted with no local option recorded on this row, so every character of context you generate leaves the machine to be completed.
El Profesor5.35.5Fitten Code — Project context understanding and multi-step task decomposition are both asserted, and the vendor does not document explicit multi-file diffs or any selection method.
La Inversora5.34.8Cody — Ending Free and Pro and archiving the public source is the tell: Cody is now a feature of Sourcegraph Enterprise, and its future is the future of code search.
La Jefa5.84.8Cody — If Sourcegraph Enterprise is already on the invoice, Cody is a free feature of it; if not, a $16K minimum for an assistant is not a purchase I would make.
El Hacker3.33.5Fitten Code — One vendor model, no key of my own, nothing local, no tool protocol and no source. There is not a single surface here I can change.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.