agentboards.org
Compare/Cody vs Tabnine

CodyvsTabnine

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Cody
Sourcegraph · IDE extension
#175MCP
Panel
4.8
0 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
4.5
Cost
4.0
Longevity
5.0

“Free and Pro ended in July 2025, so the cheapest way to try Cody is now a $16K annual contract.”

Tabnine
Tabnine (Tricentis) · IDE extension
#108MCP
Panel
5.6
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
5.2
Cost
5.0
Longevity
6.2

“The one agent here you can run air-gapped, priced so that only a company with an air gap can afford it.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodyTabnine
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeekTabnine, Claude, GPT, Gemini, Devstral, Qwen, GLM, MiniMax
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelseatseat
Starts atn/a$39/mo
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars3,804n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodyTabninePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo4.85.3Tabnine — Tabnine is for the regulated shop that needs an agent inside an air gap; nobody else should adopt it, since there is no free plan, seats are $39 to $59 on annual terms, and it was just acquired.
El Crítico4.35.3Tabnine — Tabnine's roadmap now belongs to a test-automation company, the agent is a $59-a-seat annual commitment with no free tier to try it on your own repo, and its own models are unbenchmarked.
El Profesor5.35.5Tabnine — Tabnine's agent is a plan-then-approve loop with eight named tools and a per-file diff gate, sound but conservative; it publishes no benchmark for its own models.
La Inversora5.36.0Tabnine — The exit already happened, Tricentis in July 2026, so the question is integration, and a test-automation acquirer suggests the roadmap bends toward testing agents.
La Jefa5.86.5Tabnine — Air-gapped, on-prem, SSO, zero retention, IP indemnification and $59 a seat on annual terms; approved, with a clause about the new owner.
El Hacker3.35.3Tabnine — Closed source, no free tier, and I cannot even try it; but it runs on-prem, air-gapped, against an LLM I host, which is more than the open tools with a cloud habit can say.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.