agentboards.org
Compare/Cosine vs Factory Droid

CosinevsFactory Droid

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Cosine
Cosine AI · Terminal agent
#100MCP
Panel
5.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.2
Longevity
5.5

“It used to be called Genie and is now named after a function that always comes back around, which is a bold choice for a startup.”

Factory Droid
Factory · Terminal agent
#65MCP
Panel
6.4
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.7
Longevity
6.5

“Charges $200 a month for the Max plan and still governs you with rolling rate limits, so the ceiling is the product.”

Spec by spec

SpecCosineFactory Droid
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesBrowser tools drive Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol, which requires launching the browser with --remote-debugging-port and setting cdp_url in ~/.cosine/config.toml. YesThe first-party Droid Control plugin (droid plugin install droid-control@factory-plugins) ships an `agent-browser` driver - a Playwright-backed CLI with Chrome DevTools Protocol support that navigates, fills forms, clicks and captures screenshots, powering /qa-test and /demo.
Sandboxed executionYesRemote environments are isolated containers built from a Dockerfile; local runs are not sandboxed. YesOS-level sandboxing isolates Droid from the filesystem and network using kernel-enforced policies (https://docs.factory.ai/autonomy-and-safety/sandbox.md).
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneLumen Scout, Lumen Outpost, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek, Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7, QwenClaude, GPT, Gemini, open-source and local models via BYOK
Bring your own modelYesLimited to ChatGPT and Claude models accessed through your own provider account. YesCustom models via `anthropic`, `openai` or `generic-chat-completion-api` providers with your own baseUrl and apiKey, plus an AWS Bedrock block with awsRegion/awsProfile.
Local modelsNoYesBYOK config in ~/.factory/settings.json takes a baseUrl, so Ollama (http://localhost:11434/v1), LM Studio (http://localhost:1234/v1) and vLLM are all documented targets.
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionsubscription
Starts at$19/mo$20/mo
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyYesYou can sign in with your own ChatGPT or Claude Max subscription, which routes billing to that provider instead of consuming Cosine credits. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/a41

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCosineFactory DroidPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.37.3Factory Droid — Pick Droid if you want one agent in the terminal, in Slack and in CI; pick OpenCode if you would rather read the source and hold the keys yourself.
El Crítico6.06.3Factory Droid — The plans are priced in dollars and metered in rolling rate limits the pricing page does not publish, so the failure mode is being stopped, not being billed.
El Profesor5.56.8Factory Droid — Droid's 58.8% Terminal-Bench result names the model and the leaderboard, which is more than most vendors manage, and its harness design is documented in hooks, MCP and Missions.
La Inversora6.07.0Factory Droid — Factory is selling to the org chart, with Slack, Teams, a Teams tier and Enterprise custom, and that is the buyer who tolerates rate limits, so the pricing ladder is a feature.
La Jefa5.36.5Factory Droid — Sixty seats on Teams is about $2,460 a month plus a rate limit nobody can budget, but the headless CI mode and Slack integration are the shape a team actually adopts.
El Hacker5.84.8Cosine — Closed source, but it takes my own Claude or ChatGPT subscription, and the browser tools want a cdp_url in ~/.cosine/config.toml pointing at a Chrome I launched.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.