agentboards.org
Compare/DeepSource vs Open Code Review

DeepSourcevsOpen Code Review

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

DeepSource
DeepSource · Code review agent
#64MCP
Panel
6.1
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
5.0
Longevity
6.8

“It detects committed secrets, which is mostly a tool for finding out which of your colleagues commits secrets.”

Open Code Review
Alibaba · Code review agent
#96OSSMCP
Panel
6.7
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.7

“The command is ocr, so half your team will assume the review is being scanned in from a fax.”

Spec by spec

SpecDeepSourceOpen Code Review
Architecture
CategoryCode review agentCode review agent
Runscloudlocal
Platformswebmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoNo
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsYesAutofix commits corrections back to the pull request. Yes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneAnthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Geminiany
Bring your own modelYesBYOK for AI Review, with inference on your own infrastructure, is an Enterprise-tier feature. Yes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$24/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryApache-2.0
GitHub starsn/a43,231

Which one would each critic pick

CriticDeepSourceOpen Code ReviewPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.56.8Open Code Review — Pick Open Code Review to get pull request comments without signing up for anything; pick CodeRabbit if you want a hosted dashboard and somebody to call when it misfires.
El Crítico6.06.0no preference
El Profesor6.56.8Open Code Review — The reported figures come from a self-authored 200-pull-request benchmark claiming higher precision at roughly a ninth of the tokens, with no methodology published to check either number.
La Inversora7.56.8DeepSource — A $24 per-user subscription with review metered per processed line on top, and bring-your-own-inference held back for the enterprise tier, is a well-designed expansion ladder.
La Jefa6.36.0DeepSource — Sixty seats at $24 billed yearly is $1,440 a month, and the annual review credit of $100 covers roughly one week before the per-line meter starts.
El Hacker4.08.0Open Code Review — Apache-2.0, a global npm install, and an MCP client, so I can bolt my own servers onto the review and read every rule that produced a comment.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.