agentboards.org
Compare/Efrit vs Refact.ai

EfritvsRefact.ai

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Efrit
Steve Yegge · IDE extension
#259OSS
Panel
5.5
1 spec wins
Reliability
4.7
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
7.3
Longevity
4.3

“Three entry points named efrit-chat, efrit-do and efrit-agent, because Emacs was never going to settle for one.”

Refact.ai
Refact.ai (Small Magellanic Cloud AI) · IDE extension
#192OSSMCP
Panel
5.3
6 spec wins
Reliability
5.0
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
7.3
Longevity
3.3

“Ships eight agent modes including one called buddy, for when the other seven feel too professional.”

Spec by spec

SpecEfritRefact.ai
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesBoth shell_exec and eval_sexp are available, and the README warns that AI-generated code executes directly in your Emacs. Yes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesRead-only version-control tools — status, diff, log and blame — are exposed to the model. Yes
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneClaudeClaude, GPT, Gemini, OpenRouter, Ollama
Bring your own modelNoYes
Local modelsNoYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseunspecifiedBSD-3-Clause
GitHub stars45569

Which one would each critic pick

CriticEfritRefact.aiPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.35.5Efrit — Pick it if Emacs is where you actually work and you want the agent inside it; pick Aider in a terminal if you are only visiting Emacs for the keybindings.
El Crítico5.35.3no preference
El Profesor6.06.0no preference
La Inversora5.83.0Efrit — One author, 454 stars, no company, and a hard binding to a single model vendor: the survival question here is not funding, it is whether one API keeps its shape.
La Jefa4.84.0Efrit — Nothing per seat and nothing to roll out: the sixty engineers who would use this are the four who already run Emacs, and no record survives of what any of them did.
El Hacker5.37.8Refact.ai — BSD-3-Clause, providers in ~/.config/refact/ including Ollama, LM Studio, vLLM and even GitHub Copilot as a backend, project state in .refact/, MCP documented in the wiki; entirely mine.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.