agentboards.org
Compare/Factory Droid vs Zero

Factory DroidvsZero

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Factory Droid
Factory · Terminal agent
#65MCP
Panel
6.4
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.7
Longevity
6.5

“Charges $200 a month for the Max plan and still governs you with rolling rate limits, so the ceiling is the product.”

Zero
Gitlawb · Terminal agent
#6OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
8.2
Longevity
6.2

“It accepts image input in a terminal, a sentence that would have ended a career in 2019.”

Spec by spec

SpecFactory DroidZero
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe first-party Droid Control plugin (droid plugin install droid-control@factory-plugins) ships an `agent-browser` driver - a Playwright-backed CLI with Chrome DevTools Protocol support that navigates, fills forms, clicks and captures screenshots, powering /qa-test and /demo. YesBrowser and terminal control helpers ship with the npm and release builds; source builds need those helper binaries on PATH or configured in local-control settings.
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level sandboxing isolates Droid from the filesystem and network using kernel-enforced policies (https://docs.factory.ai/autonomy-and-safety/sandbox.md). NoZero ships a native Linux sandbox helper using seccomp rather than Docker; source builds must build the `zero-linux-sandbox` helper separately.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes`zero exec` returns exit codes and has a documented GitHub Action recipe.
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, open-source and local models via BYOKOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Groq, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Mistral, xAI, Qwen, Kimi, GitHub Models, Fireworks, MiniMax, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelYesCustom models via `anthropic`, `openai` or `generic-chat-completion-api` providers with your own baseUrl and apiKey, plus an AWS Bedrock block with awsRegion/awsProfile. Yes
Local modelsYesBYOK config in ~/.factory/settings.json takes a baseUrl, so Ollama (http://localhost:11434/v1), LM Studio (http://localhost:1234/v1) and vLLM are all documented targets. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryMIT
GitHub stars411,688

Which one would each critic pick

CriticFactory DroidZeroPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.36.8Zero — Package builds ship the browser and terminal control helpers; a source build needs those binaries on PATH and expects you to build the Linux sandbox helper separately.
El Profesor6.87.3Zero — Sessions can be resumed or forked, which makes a continuation a controlled variable, and the headless mode emits text, JSON or stream-JSON rather than prose only.
La Inversora7.05.5Factory Droid — Factory is selling to the org chart, with Slack, Teams, a Teams tier and Enterprise custom, and that is the buyer who tolerates rate limits, so the pricing ladder is a feature.
La Jefa6.56.8Zero — Nothing to license for sixty, and it is the rare tool that returns meaningful exit codes with a documented continuous integration recipe, so it can gate a build.
El Hacker4.88.5Zero — MIT, twenty-five providers with Ollama and LM Studio among them, and it works as an MCP server as well as a client, so my tools go both ways.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.