agentboards.org
Compare/Jules vs Manus

JulesvsManus

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Jules
Google · Autonomous SWE
#141MCP
Panel
5.7
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
6.3
Longevity
5.3

“Fifteen free tasks a day, as long as you are over 18 and using a personal Gmail rather than the company account.”

Manus
Butterfly Effect (Manus) · Autonomous SWE
#205MCP
Panel
4.5
1 spec wins
Reliability
3.8
Usefulness
5.7
Cost
4.0
Longevity
4.3

“The free plan refreshes 300 credits a day, which is the agent equivalent of the hotel breakfast.”

Spec by spec

SpecJulesManus
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runscloud, sandboxcloud, sandbox
Platformsweb, macos, linux, windowsweb, macos, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe default VM image includes Playwright and chromedriver, and Jules renders a front end and returns screenshots to verify its work (https://jules.google/docs/environment). Yes
Sandboxed executionYesEach task gets a secure, short-lived Ubuntu VM with internet access (https://jules.google/docs/environment). Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeYesScriptable through `jules remote new --repo ... --session "..."` and the REST API (https://jules.google/docs/cli/reference). Yes
Models
BackboneGemini 3 Flash, Gemini 3.1 ProManus 1.6, Manus 1.6 Max, Manus 1.6 Lite
Bring your own modelNoJules runs only on Google-hosted Gemini models; there is no provider picker, custom base URL, gateway or cloud deployment of your own. No
Local modelsNoTasks run in a Google-hosted VM with no configurable model endpoint, so no local LLM can be used. No
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionsubscription
Starts at$19.99/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyNoAccess comes from a Google AI plan; no Gemini API key or Google Cloud project of your own can be attached. No
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticJulesManusPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.85.5Jules — Use Jules for the backlog you never get to, fifteen free tasks a day on a personal Google account, and do not adopt it as a team tool because the paid plans do not accept business accounts yet.
El Crítico6.34.5Jules — Jules runs your repo in a VM you cannot inspect on a model you cannot choose, and the failure mode is a pull request built on an environment that never installed correctly.
El Profesor6.34.5Jules — Jules has the correct autonomous architecture, an isolated VM, a plan reviewed before edits, tests run in place, and publishes no benchmark by which to judge what it does with it.
La Inversora6.04.8Jules — Jules is a feature of a consumer subscription, not a company, and the risk to a buyer is a deprecation notice rather than a bankruptcy.
La Jefa4.84.3Jules — Paid plans are limited to individual Google accounts and Workspace support is in development, so there is no way to buy this for sixty engineers; not yet.
El Hacker4.33.3Jules — A closed VM, Gemini only, a curated MCP list and no key of my own; the CLI and REST API are the only handles, and they are decent handles.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.