agentboards.org
Compare/OpenMozi vs harness

OpenMozivsharness

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

OpenMozi
spytensor · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
5.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
4.8
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
7.3
Longevity
4.7

“It generates PowerPoint decks in-app, so your coding agent can now produce the slide explaining why the release slipped.”

harness
wedow · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
5.6
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.0
Usefulness
5.5
Cost
7.3
Longevity
4.7

“It can sign in with your ChatGPT or Claude subscription, which is a large decision for a hundred lines of shell script to be making.”

Spec by spec

SpecOpenMoziharness
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesOpenMozi searches the web and reads pages; the README does not describe browser automation. No
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneAnthropic, multiple providersAnthropic, OpenAI, Groq, ChatGPT subscription, Claude subscription
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars404169

Which one would each critic pick

CriticOpenMoziharnessPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.06.0no preference
El Crítico5.34.5OpenMozi — It schedules recurring tasks and offers a permission level described as full access, and the row records no isolation between the two.
El Profesor6.86.3OpenMozi — Every claimed deliverable is checked against the filesystem before completion is reported, which converts the most common failure in this category into a detectable one.
La Inversora5.05.5harness — A hundred and sixty-seven stars against more than a thousand forum mentions in a year: this is the most-discussed and least-installed row I have read today.
La Jefa4.84.3OpenMozi — Free across sixty desktops, and it keeps long-term memory across sessions, which is a data retention question nobody has answered and my policy requires answering.
El Hacker5.57.3harness — MIT, Homebrew or the AUR, and the entire dependency list is bash, jq and curl, with plugins in whatever language I feel like writing them in.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.